Faculty members are encouraged to engage with their Head of Faculty or Line Manager, as well as the IADT Teaching and Learning Committee, to gain insights on the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) within teaching, learning, and assessment approaches. This section of the LibGuide provides information regarding the implications of AI for information-seeking processes related to research and publication. While this LibGuide on AI primarily targets students, it includes sections that are also useful for faculty, such as:
AI Support for Research Development
AI tools can assist faculty in developing research questions and objectives, as well as brainstorming potential methodologies. This support enables researchers to clarify their focus and approach early in the research process. AI platforms retrieve information resources of variable quality and reliability however. It is important to prioritise IADT Library's academic databases. See further information on the limitations of AI here.
Literature Review Assistance
Platforms such as Elicit AI and Connected Papers facilitate literature reviews by offering overviews of key papers within specific subject areas. Connected Papers, in particular, visualises the relationships between these papers, helping researchers understand the academic landscape and identify relevant studies efficiently. See videos below.
Editing and Maintaining Research Integrity
While AI can aid in editing, it is crucial to maintain research integrity. Faculty should ensure that use of AI is ethically sound and acknowledged, maintaining the quality and credibility of their work.
Data Analysis and Visualisation
AI tools can analyse data sets and produce visualisations, simplifying the interpretation of complex information. This capability allows researchers to uncover patterns and insights that may not be immediately apparent. It is also important to consider the limitations of AI in this respect such as bias and the potential for errors.
Dr Lai Mai in a short commentary entitled: View of Generative AI for Academic Publishing? Some Thoughts About Epistemic Diversity and the Pursuit of Truth (uvic.ca), discusses the impact of AI on academic publishing in relation to diminished bibliodiversity, epistemic diversity, and increased data surveillance. Invoking the Sokal hoax, the commentary also cautions against the potential erosion of public trust in academic publishing in the age of generative AI.
In a reflection entitled 'Flood of 'junk': How AI is changing scientific publishing,' Daniel Lawlor highlights concerns about AI's impact on scientific publishing, leading to an influx of low-quality and plagiarised papers. Notable incidents include bizarre AI-generated content published in reputable journals and a study published by Elsevier which went viral in March for its introduction, which was clearly a ChatGPT prompt that read: "Certainly, here is a possible introduction for your topic."
AI is being used by numerous academic publishers to support:
Human oversight remains essential however to:
To find out more about the impact of AI on scholarly publishing check out this piece by Scholarly Kitchen here which comprises an interview with:
Faculty seeking to publish in the academic literature are advised to consult the guidelines of individual publishers in relation to the use of AI. The majority of academic publishers adhere to guidelines issued by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
COPE Position Statement on Authorship and AI Tools (2023)
Elicit AI.(2024). Using Elicit to find hundreds of relevant academic papers. Youtube. https://youtu.be/kI6wG46ua2E?si=oaEmT1PHwL-QlgF_